It appears that the exam question is flawed, which is not uncommon in such situations. The terminology used, such as "Document-level declaration," lacks clarity and can be interpreted in various ways. Additionally, the term "normal" is vague without a specific definition provided, although it seems to suggest the absence of !important
.
Given the presence of an !important
rule in option “a” from a browser style sheet, it may override options “b” and “c” (and potentially “d” if relevant), but asserting that option “a” universally takes precedence over the others would be inaccurate. There could be ambiguity surrounding the application of !important
within browser style sheets.
It is possible that the person who created the exam overlooked the potential impact of an !important
rule within a browser style sheet, leading to confusion regarding the correct answer, which might be interpreted as choice “c.”
Furthermore, the inclusion of option “d” might aim to mislead students since if it refers to a style sheet embedded in an HTML document, it falls under the category of an author style sheet, and the cascade rules are unaffected by whether the style sheet is embedded or linked.