Can scss be considered backwards compatible with less? Personally, I have my doubts. One key difference is that while less uses '@' to prefix variables, scss opts for '$'. Changing the variable prefix might not be enough, as there are likely functions and handling methods unique to each preprocessor.
A colleague has been adamant that scss is indeed backwards compatible with less. However, this assertion seems dubious to me. While both less and scss can compile down to css, it's unclear if scss truly maintains compatibility with less. Can you shed some light on this?