I am currently diving into the complexities of the CSS concept known as the Visual Formatting Model, with a keen focus on the section titled Controlling box generation.
Within the realm of Anonymous Block Boxes, there exists an example that illustrates this scenario:
<DIV>
Some text
<P>More text
</DIV>
The explanation provided is quite enlightening:
When both the DIV and P elements have 'display: block' properties, it appears that the DIV contains both inline and block content. To simplify formatting, an assumption is made that there exists an anonymous block box surrounding "Some text".
In simpler terms: if a block container box (like the DIV in this case) encloses a block-level box (such as the P element), it is coerced to contain only block-level boxes within.
Initially, my understanding from the specification led me to believe that an anonymous block box would only apply to text elements. However, delving into a more intricate example reveals a different perspective, demonstrated by the following markup:
<div>
some <em>text</em>
<p>More text</p>
and more <em>text</em>
</div>
This highlights the fact that not just individual words like "some", but entire phrases like "some <em>text</em>" are considered as anonymous block boxes. Treating each word as a separate block box could disrupt the layout consistency by placing them on separate lines.
Hence, we end up with a total of 3 block boxes (2 of which are anonymous):
- An anonymous block box:
some <em>text</em>
. - A block box:
<p>More text<p>
. - An anonymous block box:
.and more <em>text</em>
Resulting in a visual representation such as: identifying anonymous block level boxes
Ultimately, can I draw the conclusion that when dealing with anonymous block box generation, if a block container consists of a block-level box inside it, then any contained boxes will be treated as block-level boxes for formatting purposes? Any non-block-level boxes would be internally categorized as anonymous block boxes, essentially functioning as block-level containers.
Does my comprehension align with these concepts, or have I veered off track?