The creators of FontAwesome have claimed that the rendering of icons can be up to 30% quicker in version 4. I am curious about the specifics behind this percentage.
- Does this speed improvement consistently amount to 30% or are there instances where it is slower?
- Is this enhancement applicable across all browsers? Are there any disparities when dealing with mobile devices?
- Is the increase in speed primarily due to the transition from using the
icon-
tofa fa-
class names?
In order to investigate these inquiries further, I would like to evaluate the speed at which icons are rendered. I have set up a JSFiddle and possess considerable knowledge of browser developer tools (specifically Chrome), is this the correct method? http://jsfiddle.net/timrpeterson/Q5TA5/2/
Which specific aspect of Chrome developer tools should I focus on? I assume it would be the section where paint speed is measured?
<div>
<link href="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.0.3/css/font-awesome.min.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<h3> v4.0.3</h3>
<i class='fa fa-comment'></i>
<i class='fa fa-envelope'></i>
</div>
<hr>
<div>
<link href="http://netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/3.2.1/css/font-awesome.min.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
<h3> v3.2.1</h3>
<i class='icon-comment'></i>
<i class='icon-envelope'></i>
</div>