Sharing my thoughts on performance, specifically regarding the use of DIVs versus traditional HTML tables. In my experience, for smaller tables (under 100 rows), there isn't a significant difference in performance between using DIVs or tables.
However, when dealing with very long datasets, it's clear that traditional tables are the way to go for optimal performance.
My perspective comes from a project at work where I initially used DIVs to generate tables dynamically based on SQL data for a reporting module. Despite my preference for DIVs, I noticed considerable performance issues, especially in IE8. Switching to tables significantly improved speed, particularly in Chrome and Safari.
To showcase the differences, I created a simple benchmark tool that allows you to compare performance using either DIVs styled like tables or actual table elements. The results showed that tables tend to be faster due to the nature of tabular data.
The code snippet below demonstrates this comparison by generating a large dataset using both methods and measuring the time taken. Feel free to try it out and see the difference for yourself!