What disparities exist between utilizing Arial Black font and regular Arial font with the tag?

Question

What disparities exist between utilizing Arial Black font and regular Arial font with the tag?

Despite setting my text to Arial Black, it appears as regular text on Firefox. To workaround this issue, I tried using the Arial font with the Strong tag but couldn't notice any visual difference. Should I be concerned about this discrepancy?

Thank you

EDIT

In this scenario, CSS is not an option for me, so I approached it like this:

<font face="Arial Black, Arial, sans-serif"> <strong>Want an undergraduate course with more hands-on practice opportunities? </strong></font>

I appreciate all the responses and explanations provided. In this context, I believe the strong tag is suitable since it highlights the most crucial part of the message. Although no one noticed a visual distinction, I am satisfied with this approach.

When I posted in jsfiddle, I was surprised that the strong tag did not create the bold effect I expected. The b tag achieved the desired result. The contrast is clear there! Thank you for the suggestion!

html css fonts

Answer 1

Answer №1

When it comes to the question title (even though the question itself appears to ask something different):

The meaning of the  tag is semantic. See what MDN says about it here.

The HTML Strong Element () gives text strong importance, and is typically displayed in bold.

Therefore, use this tag to mark up content that you want to emphasize, not just to make text appear bold.

However, most browsers will simply display emphasized text as bold.

If you specifically want bold text, utilize the appropriate CSS for it!

font-weight: bold;

Answer 2

When it comes to the question title (even though the question itself appears to ask something different):

The meaning of the  tag is semantic. See what MDN says about it here.

The HTML Strong Element () gives text strong importance, and is typically displayed in bold.

Therefore, use this tag to mark up content that you want to emphasize, not just to make text appear bold.

However, most browsers will simply display emphasized text as bold.

If you specifically want bold text, utilize the appropriate CSS for it!

font-weight: bold;

Answer 3

Answer №2

 conveys a specific semantic message (such as "more important"), and therefore should not be used solely for styling purposes. If you wish to make text bold, simply use font-weight: 700.

Alternatively, address the issue of Arial Black not functioning properly :P It could be due to the lack of quotation marks around the font name.

font-family: Arial;

is perfectly fine, whereas

font-family: Arial Black;

is not. Ensure that you include

font-family: "Arial Black";

Answer 4

 conveys a specific semantic message (such as "more important"), and therefore should not be used solely for styling purposes. If you wish to make text bold, simply use font-weight: 700.

Alternatively, address the issue of Arial Black not functioning properly :P It could be due to the lack of quotation marks around the font name.

font-family: Arial;

is perfectly fine, whereas

font-family: Arial Black;

is not. Ensure that you include

font-family: "Arial Black";

Answer 5

Answer №3

A significant distinction exists between utilizing Arial Black and Arial with the use of the strong element in CSS. To clarify, I will address this matter from a CSS perspective by substituting the HTML strong markup with the CSS property font-weight: bolder. Whether bold styling is implemented directly through CSS or indirectly via HTML markup that implies a default setting is inconsequential in this context.

The statement regarding "Arial Black not working on Firefox" lacks clarity.

An appropriate CSS snippet for achieving the desired effect would be:

font-family: Arial; font-weight: 900;

This directive requests the boldest available font within the Arial typeface family, which typically resolves to Arial Black when accessible, otherwise falling back to Arial Bold. It is worth noting that while Firefox may exhibit inconsistent behavior in supporting this feature, other browsers may present more severe issues related to font weights (e.g., Chrome rendering weight 600 as bolder than 700).

In practical terms, it is advisable to adhere to the traditional approach, referring to a specific font type as if it were an entire font family:

font-family: Arial Black;

For instance, IE 8 exclusively requires this method to render Arial Black, whereas IE 9 also accommodates the modern convention (in "Standards Mode").

If you specify the font as Arial and apply a font weight of bolder, the output will be Arial Bold. Alternatively, designating font-family: Arial Black alongside font-weight: bolder will yield Arial Black since there are no heavier variations available. Notably, Arial Bold and Arial Black exhibit distinct characteristics.

The cause of any issues encountered in your initial trials cannot be pinpointed without the actual code samples being provided.

Answer 6

A significant distinction exists between utilizing Arial Black and Arial with the use of the strong element in CSS. To clarify, I will address this matter from a CSS perspective by substituting the HTML strong markup with the CSS property font-weight: bolder. Whether bold styling is implemented directly through CSS or indirectly via HTML markup that implies a default setting is inconsequential in this context.

The statement regarding "Arial Black not working on Firefox" lacks clarity.

An appropriate CSS snippet for achieving the desired effect would be:

font-family: Arial; font-weight: 900;

This directive requests the boldest available font within the Arial typeface family, which typically resolves to Arial Black when accessible, otherwise falling back to Arial Bold. It is worth noting that while Firefox may exhibit inconsistent behavior in supporting this feature, other browsers may present more severe issues related to font weights (e.g., Chrome rendering weight 600 as bolder than 700).

In practical terms, it is advisable to adhere to the traditional approach, referring to a specific font type as if it were an entire font family:

font-family: Arial Black;

For instance, IE 8 exclusively requires this method to render Arial Black, whereas IE 9 also accommodates the modern convention (in "Standards Mode").

If you specify the font as Arial and apply a font weight of bolder, the output will be Arial Bold. Alternatively, designating font-family: Arial Black alongside font-weight: bolder will yield Arial Black since there are no heavier variations available. Notably, Arial Bold and Arial Black exhibit distinct characteristics.

The cause of any issues encountered in your initial trials cannot be pinpointed without the actual code samples being provided.

Answer 7

Answer №4

In my opinion, achieving the desired effect would be possible using CSS styling instead of relying on the strong tag.

.arial-black{
  font-family: Arial;
  font-weight: bold;
}

Answer 8

In my opinion, achieving the desired effect would be possible using CSS styling instead of relying on the strong tag.

.arial-black{
  font-family: Arial;
  font-weight: bold;
}

Answer 9

Answer №5

When it comes to styling text for emphasis, the , , and font-weight:700|bold; options all appear visually similar.

However, it's important to note that the  tag is specifically recognized by screen readers, serving as a way to add emphasis for individuals who are blind or have low vision. Using a simple "bold" font style may not provide the same effect for those using screen readers.

If your main concern is not emphasizing text for screen readers, then opting for the  tag would be a better choice in this scenario.

Answer 10

When it comes to styling text for emphasis, the , , and font-weight:700|bold; options all appear visually similar.

However, it's important to note that the  tag is specifically recognized by screen readers, serving as a way to add emphasis for individuals who are blind or have low vision. Using a simple "bold" font style may not provide the same effect for those using screen readers.

If your main concern is not emphasizing text for screen readers, then opting for the  tag would be a better choice in this scenario.

Answer 11

Answer №6

 tag may not display consistently across all browsers, particularly with variations in font size and weight between Arial and Arial Black.

Therefore, the response to your query is affirmative.

Answer 12

 tag may not display consistently across all browsers, particularly with variations in font size and weight between Arial and Arial Black.

Therefore, the response to your query is affirmative.

Answer 13

Answer №7

Utilizing the font Arial Black on a website will only be effective for users who actually have that specific font installed. (Similarly, using Arial will only work on systems with that font available).

Arial Black is not simply a bold variation of Arial. While similar, Arial Black has a distinct appearance compared to the bold version of Arial:

Arial, bold
Arial Black

It's important to designate a fallback font for all fonts used in order to provide an alternative if the specific font is unavailable. However, it can be challenging when dealing with a font that is bold by default, as you cannot set Arial bold as a fallback for Arial Black. In such cases, using Arial as the fallback option is recommended:

font-family: 'Arial Black', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;

Answer 14

Utilizing the font Arial Black on a website will only be effective for users who actually have that specific font installed. (Similarly, using Arial will only work on systems with that font available).

Arial Black is not simply a bold variation of Arial. While similar, Arial Black has a distinct appearance compared to the bold version of Arial:

Arial, bold
Arial Black

It's important to designate a fallback font for all fonts used in order to provide an alternative if the specific font is unavailable. However, it can be challenging when dealing with a font that is bold by default, as you cannot set Arial bold as a fallback for Arial Black. In such cases, using Arial as the fallback option is recommended:

font-family: 'Arial Black', Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;

Answer 15

Answer №8

To ensure Arial Black is used whenever the bold font-weight of Arial is specified, you can employ a CSS @font-face rule:

@font-face {
    font-family: Arial;
    /* Additional common names can be included using comma-separated local definitions here */
    src: local('Arial Black');
    font-weight: bold;
}

@font-face {
    font-family: Arial;
    src: local('Arial');
    font-weight: normal;
}

By implementing this code snippet, any instance where Arial is designated as the font and the font weight is calculated as bold (typically set for the strong tag in user-agent HTML default styles), Arial Black will be utilized instead.

Answer 16

To ensure Arial Black is used whenever the bold font-weight of Arial is specified, you can employ a CSS @font-face rule:

@font-face {
    font-family: Arial;
    /* Additional common names can be included using comma-separated local definitions here */
    src: local('Arial Black');
    font-weight: bold;
}

@font-face {
    font-family: Arial;
    src: local('Arial');
    font-weight: normal;
}

By implementing this code snippet, any instance where Arial is designated as the font and the font weight is calculated as bold (typically set for the strong tag in user-agent HTML default styles), Arial Black will be utilized instead.

Answer 17

Answer №9

The strong tag is responsible for rendering text in bold. In your situation, it may not have a noticeable impact. However, the difference becomes apparent when using a different font and applying the "strong" attribute.

Answer 18

The strong tag is responsible for rendering text in bold. In your situation, it may not have a noticeable impact. However, the difference becomes apparent when using a different font and applying the "strong" attribute.

What disparities exist between utilizing Arial Black font and regular Arial font with the <Strong> tag?

Answer №1

Answer №2

Answer №3

Answer №4

Answer №5

Answer №6

Answer №7

Answer №8

Answer №9

Similar questions

Having trouble displaying background images on GitHub pages?

Issues with ASP.net CSS not functioning properly in Internet Explorer, although it works fine in Firefox, Edge, and

Guide to retrieving the primary key auto-increment value for the ID field in an SQL record using PHP Scripting

When the mouse hovers over, include a fade-in effect for the image

Issues are occurring with the @font-face css for the Futura Bk BT Bok.ttf font file

blurring out of an input field and a division element

Can you provide me with information on how to indicate the activated menu item by highlighting the triggering button in Angular 14 and Material Design?

Switching the sorting criteria from 'AND' to 'OR' in the JPList library

Retrieve the order in which the class names are displayed within the user interface

Color Swap Hover Animation

How can I consistently position a dialog box (tooltip) on top of a JQuery UI modal Dialog?

Adding a PHP file into an HTML page using JavaScript include

The navigation bar vanishes when a picture is inserted below it

Incorporating an SVG Element into a design while ensuring its responsive functionality

What steps should I take to ensure that the getElementsbyName function works properly on both Internet Explorer and Firefox browsers

Overlay with a progress bar that obscures visibility

The cakePHP time dropdown feature lacks customization options

The data input from the HTML is not being correctly transferred to the modal

Python - Selenium: A guide to locating elements based on color

Creating a loading animation using HTML and CSS for textual content