In the world of web design, a table cell's minimum width is determined by two factors: it can either be 0 or equal to the size of the largest word or image within that cell.
Delving into the default sizing algorithm for tables requires a thorough examination involving two passes through the table data. The initial pass involves disabling word wrapping and making note of the minimum and maximum width of each cell. The maximum width is calculated based on the widest line present, while paragraphs are treated as long lines if not broken by line breaks. On the other hand, the minimum width considers the broadest word or image, factoring in any leading indents, list bullets, etc. Essentially, imagine formatting the content of a cell in its own window to determine the smallest width before content starts to get cut off.
The subsequent steps utilize the minimum and maximum cell widths to establish corresponding values for columns. These column widths help derive the overall minimum and maximum width for the table itself. Even with nested tables in cells, managing this process remains relatively uncomplicated. Following this, adjustments are made to assign column widths according to the existing window space, essentially the area between left and right margins.
It's crucial to incorporate table borders and intercell margins during this assignment phase. Three scenarios may arise:
- If the minimum table width matches or exceeds available space, opt for minimum widths and enable horizontal scrolling when needed. To simplify conversions like braille, cells exceeding limits can be referenced via notes placed prior to the table's display.
- If the maximum table width fits well within the available space, proceed by setting columns to their maximal widths.
- In cases where the maximum table width surpasses available space but the minimum falls short, calculate the disparity between space and minimum width (denoted as W) along with the difference between maximum and minimum table width (referred to as D).
For each column, define d as the variance between maximum and minimum width of that particular column. Then, set the column width to the minimum width plus d times W over D, allowing text-heavy columns to widen more than those with less text.
This assignment tactic extends to nested tables, where the enclosing table cell's width mirrors the current window size. The recursive application covers all embedded tables systematically.
If the COLSPEC attribute outlines explicit column widths, the user agent should attempt to adhere to these specifications. However, if column overflow occurs later on, resort back to the two-pass mechanism to rectify width discrepancies. For relative widths specified, following the two-step model becomes mandatory.
The modified column width assignment algorithm prioritizes:
- Utilizing explicitly stated widths from the COLSPEC attribute, given they exceed the minimum column width; otherwise, resort to the latter.
- If dealing with relative widths, distribute surplus space accordingly among columns to meet minimum width requirements. When no surplus exists, adjust column widths above minimum levels to fulfill relative width criteria.
In instances where the WIDTH attribute defines table width, align column widths accordingly unless doing so compromises their minimum measurements.