Within my website, there are numerous utility classes designed to set the width of various elements. In most cases, utilizing the width
property works perfectly fine. However, I have encountered an issue when dealing with flexbox elements. Instead of using the width
property for flex items, the flex
property must be employed. To address this discrepancy, I attempted to create a single class that combines both properties:
.width-100 {
width: 100px !important;
flex: 0 0 100px !important;
}
To my surprise, this combined approach did work in the limited instances where I tested it. Elements not leveraging flexbox had their width correctly defined by the width
property, while those using flexbox functioned as expected thanks to the flex
property. Despite this success, I am left pondering whether this solution introduces potential bugs that may currently elude me.